Mar 1, 2007 at 11:06am ET by Danny Sullivan
I’ve been spreading the word about search in print recently and wanted to share more about that. At the end of January, I started doing a regular monthly column in Ad Age on search marketing. Meanwhile, this month I took part in a Fast Company debate about Google. For those interested, more on both below.
What Makes Search Magical was my first Ad Age column that ran at the end of January. You have to be a paid Ad Age subscriber to read it, sorry! It was written especially for traditional marketers, to try and explain why search is a different creature than they might be used to. Here’s the top of the column:
Yes, search is magical. For years, I’ve described search as a "reverse broadcast system." In a broadcast system, advertisers spend lots of money to reach a mass audience, hoping to build desire for a product or service. But most of the audience is not interested in their pitches. Search is the reverse. Each search is an expressed desire, something that someone at a particular time actually wants. Advertisers can tune in to the "desire-cast" that’s going on.
On Search Marketing: A New Google? Not Likely is my second column now out — and it’s open to anyone to read. It covers the "network" model of search I’ve long used to explain why I don’t expect some upstart service to wipe out Google any time soon. Again, here’s the top of the column:
Who’s the next Google? Many ask this question, assuming it’s just a matter of time before a new upstart search champion appears. Trust me, it’s not. To understand, consider that you rarely hear people pondering who is going to be the next ABC, NBC or CBS. Yes, there’s a search war going on. But rather than it being a winner-take-all battle, the landscape is far more like a network-TV ratings fight. The major TV networks might get stronger or weaker relative to each other, but they don’t disappear. Nor do new ones easily emerge to take away share.
Think Google’s overrated? Think it’s going to stick around? That was the focus of the debate in Fast Company between me and Donna Bogatin of ZDNet’s Digital Markets blog. You’ll find us squaring off in Is Google overrated? Tapped out? Due for a fall? Two experts take sides at Fast Company. It was fun to do. That debate is also in print — last page of the March 2007 edition that’s out now, complete with pictures of both of us, though I’m sure you can do without the picture of me :)
Share, Bookmark & Discuss This Article
More:
Keep Updated: News Via Email | News Via RSS Feed | News Via Twitter
See more stories like this in the Members Library! Check out the About Search Engine Land, Google: Business Issues, Google: Critics, Google: General, SEM Industry: General, Search Ads: General sections of the Members Library where this story is filed. Members also get access to exclusive video content, a members-only weekly & monthly newsletter, plus more. Check out all the benefits!
TOP STORIES
SEARCH NEWS BRIEFS
FEATURES & ANALYSIS
RECENT COMMNENTS
Stay on top of all the search news with our daily summary, the SearchCap newsletter. View a sample ›
Search Engine Land produces SMX, the Search Marketing Expo conference series. SMX events deliver the most comprehensive educational and networking experiences - whether you're just starting in search marketing or you're a seasoned expert.
SMX Web Site » | SMX Difference » | SMX News »
Join us at an upcoming SMX event:
Learn more about search marketing with our free online webcasts and webinars from our sister site, Search Marketing Now. Upcoming online events include:
Featured sites from our Blogroll
Become a premium member today and receive:
Danny:
Congrats on the Ad Age column. That must have been a fun debate. I saw this blog mention of it: http://blogs.zdnet.com/keen/?p=103
And here were my comments — you came off sounding far more persuasive than she did. She didn’t criticize Google in any of the ways it makes sense to do so:
http://talkback.zdnet.com/5208-12693-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=30835&messageID=572530&start=-1