French Company Seeks $421M From Google For “Blacklisting”

Perhaps sensing “blood in the water,” a French company called 1plusV has sued Google in the Paris Commercial Court for the equivalent of $421 million. (The civil complaint was orginally filed on February 22, 2011.)

An operator of vertical search sites, 1plusV is the corporate parent of legal search engine Ejustice.fr, one of three companies (including Foundem and Microsoft-owned Ciao) that filed formal antitrust complaints against Google with European Commission last year. Those complaints led directly to the EC’s decision to pursue an antitrust action against Google, which is now in process.

The civil case doesn’t really involve a new set of claims but is a kind of follow-up to Ejustice’s earlier complaint, this time for substantial money damages. 1plusV wouldn’t be entitled to any damages from the EC antitrust action if there were findings against Google.

1plusV claims its sites were “blacklisted” by Google and lost most of their traffic over a period of several years, suffering “irreparable” harm. According to the company Google’s blacklisting clipped the wings of 30 promising vertical search sites operated by 1plusV:
Between 2007 and 2010 no less than 30 vertical search engines created by 1plusV were “black-listed”, some of which showed significant business potential. A few or these 30 vertical search engines have been recently “white-listed”, i.e. indexed again by Google’s robots (without any content change nor explanation) but irreparable damage has been done; if all 30 search engines created by 1plusV had been allowed to compete on their merits, yearly sales would currently amount to more than €30 million

In addition, the company detailed what it said were Google’s anti-competitive or “unethical” behaviors:

  • suffocation of technological competitors through a bundled access to ads revenue for the exclusive use of Google’s technology. 1plusV had to get rid of VSearch early in order to be granted access to AdSense real time.
  • unfair competition in referencing Editors websites through the listing in Google results of sensitive and private data, including data from Government agencies’ extranets which explicitly ban these practices.
  • manipulation of “natural results” through (i) the artificial pushing up of Google’s own services to the first page of search results without giving Internet users any chance to differentiate from real organic results and (ii) the discriminatory application of so-called “quality criteria” between competitors and own services.

I wrote a lengthy post yesterday arguing that the US Federal Trade Commission was unlikely to find evidence that Google engaged in anti-competitive behavior in the US market. The case in Europe I believe is much tougher for Google.

Whereas Bing and Yahoo combine for 30 percent of the search market in the US, Google controls 90 percent (or more) of the market, depending on the country, in Europe. This makes it much more challenging for sites to be found by users if they don’t rank on Google and for Google to claim that there are alternative ways to find properties.

Under normal circumstances Google might be inclined to settle a civil case like this, although the alleged damages are very substantial. Doing so however would probably give a “green light” to other would-be litigants that have similar grievances against Google.

Related Topics: Channel: Display | Google: AdSense | Google: Business Issues | Google: Critics | Google: Legal | Google: Outside US | Top News

Sponsored


About The Author: is a Contributing Editor at Search Engine Land. He writes a personal blog Screenwerk, about SoLoMo issues and connecting the dots between online and offline. He also posts at Internet2Go, which is focused on the mobile Internet. Follow him @gsterling.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://www.gamerstube.com Joe Youngblood

    i can see nations wanting to seek regulation of the search market, not censorship (ala China, which Google was happy to comply with for a time) but regulation to keep the field competitive and to keep search engines accountable.

  • http://www.gamerstube.com Joe Youngblood

    here’s a thought. maybe somehow require a browsers default tab open up initially on a page that randomly lists search providers websites (by logo maybe?) within a nation. this would give upstart search engines more exposure while allowing the user to set a default page after the first load.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Biggie-Smallz/100002311346508 Biggie Smallz

    Such a ridiculous and frivolous lawsuit. This kind of stuff pisses me off. “Hey let’s sue Google because our site isn’t ranked #1 and making any money!” It’s called a business plan, and those retards at 1plusV shouldn’t have started to play with the big boys if they aren’t smart enough to NOT put their entire business into one single point of failure…WHICH THEY DON’T CONTROL.

    It’s called business 101, maybe that’s why the french unemployment rate is so high…Oh well, being unemployed certainly gives them more time to sit around and think up more outrageous lawsuits.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide