Microsoft’s Bing Vs Google: Head To Head Search Results

Let’s just get it out of the way: no, Bing is not a “Google Killer.” It’s also safe to say that Microsoft doesn’t see it that way either. My understanding of what Microsoft believes it has in Bing is a much more competitive product than Live Search. I entirely agree.

Over the course of the next two or three weeks there will be countless articles and blog posts discussing Bing and whether or not it can dethrone Google. Microsoft has told me that the company sees Bing as a start (or restart) and that improvements will continue to roll out over time. One can be skeptical of that position or not. Regardless, Bing is a big advancement for Microsoft’s search efforts.

picture-45

I’ve been using Bing (Kumo) off and on over that past couple of weeks. I’ve used it side by side with Google and by itself. In some cases I’ve been self-consciously testing and comparing results. At other times, I’ve simply used it to find information or navigate to desired sites.

Let me say that this post is not intended to be a detailed discussion of Bing’s “anatomy” and features. Danny and others will delve into those areas and may express different opinions and conclusions than I do here. As an aside, there are range of features that I like quite a bit; among them the “table of contents” that often appears in the upper left column (see graphic below) and the easily accessible search history, which will likely be further developed in interesting ways. (A Silverlight-enhanced version of search history adds more utility and even makes it social.)

picture-44

My overall assessment is very positive. Kumo, now Bing, has performed well and I’ve been satisfied with the results. There haven’t been any significant deficiencies or missing links (so to speak). While there have been a few occasions where I’ve found Google results to be better, the substantial gap that existed between Google and Live Search is largely gone with Bing.

Microsoft has integrated the Powerset technology to varying degrees and made numerous algorithmic improvements on the “back end” that are largely opaque to me. More obvious are the interface upgrades and changes. While many people are accustomed — even habituated — to the Google UI, I appreciated the often richer visual presentation and generally “cleaner” organization of Bing SERPs.

So now you’re probably thinking will I start using Bing instead of Google?

To be candid I don’t see myself giving up Google, especially given the default Firefox browser integration. But I can also honestly say that while I almost never used Live Search except to write about it, I will indeed use Bing. Unfortunately you won’t be able to try it for yourself until next week when it goes live.

I cannot predict how you or others will react or whether Microsoft’s reportedly massive ad campaign for Bing will drive adoption. Advertising can generate awareness or curiosity but that’s about it. The bottom line is whether people find the results and their presentation to be compelling enough to actually use Bing.

So to provide a more concrete sense of Bing in advance of the launch, I conducted a range of basic searches that one might do in a given week and captured screens from both Google and Bing to offer a visual side-by-side comparison. The following are the queries that I used:

  • Bing (couldn’t resist)
  • Sonia Sotomayor
  • George Clooney
  • Hotels, New York
  • Playoffs (NBA)
  • Prius
  • Up (the movie)
  • United Airlines
  • Best sushi los angeles

And away we go . . .

QUERY: “BING”

Google results:

picture-122

Bing results:

picture-131

Bing’s main SERP has more information about Bing Crosby the actor-singer than the Microsoft search engine. And Google does a generally better job here of surfacing results tied to the new search engine. However, if I click on “news” in the Bing table of contents, I do get the results I was looking for:

picture-141

By exposing the recently introduced left-column links and drill-downs Google can also get much more specific by date or type of content:

picture-151

QUERY: “SONIA SOTOMAYOR”

Bing results:

picture-10

Google results:

picture-112

QUERY: “GEORGE CLOONEY”

Google results:

picture-37

Bing results:

picture-36

The images of Clooney make the Bing SERP in this case much more interesting. In addition, the table of contents in the upper left provides quick access to more specific information about the actor without having to click back and forth.

QUERY: “HOTELS, NEW YORK”

Google results:

picture-32

Bing results:

picture-41

In this case, Microsoft has more or less copied the Google “10 pack” and the pages look almost identical. Clicking “Local” in the table of contents takes a user to a map-centric page, while selecting “Deals” offers data from Microsoft’s Farecast travel engine:

picture-8

picture-9

The integration of Farecast data and results for travel-related queries yield some of the richest and most compelling results on Bing in my view.

QUERY: “PLAYOFFS” (seeking NBA results)

Bing results:

picture-16

Refining by “Playoffs NBA” (left nav) offers quick scores and schedule information:

picture-17

Clicking News in the left nav offers more in-depth information including video (which can be previewed in the SERP by mousing over the thumbnails):

picture-18

On Google I can do similar things, clicking through to news results or getting video (without the thumbnail preview):

picture-19

picture-20

picture-21

QUERY: “PRIUS”

Bing results:

picture-25

Google results:

picture-26

The Bing page is again more compelling with the image of the car and the basic data about price and mileage, as well as local dealer listings. In addition, the TOC allows users to quickly get to the category of information they’re seeking. Although you can get to much of the same information on Google, the Bing layout surfaces much of that information more quickly.

QUERY: “UP” (the movie)

Google results:

picture-27

The ad on the right allows me to watch the movie trailer by clicking the “plus box.”

picture-301

I can also open the “show options” link and get to more video results:

picture-311

Bing results:

picture-28

Bing does a better job here, using IP targeting to create a default location (and associated movie listings) that can then be changed or made more specific. Users can click Video to see trailers and related footage.

picture-29

QUERY: “UNITED AIRLINES”

Bing results:

picture-33

Google results:

picture-321

QUERY: “BEST SUSHI, LOS ANGELES”

Google results:

picture-411

Bing results:

picture-42

Some may look at the screens above and shrug. Indeed, some people have argued to me that Bing “has to be at least 50 percent better” than Google to start peeling away users loyal to Google (or Yahoo). Bing isn’t 50 percent better than Google. However, Bing does offer results that are, across the searches I conducted, highly competitive with Google and in some cases it offers features that are more user-friendly.

Given the strength of Google’s brand and its “ownership” of search Bing may struggle to make market share gains. However I predict that it will gain share. Those potential gains may come not at Google’s expense but rather from Ask, AOL or even Yahoo.

See also the companion pieces to this article:

Related Topics: Channel: Industry | Microsoft: Bing | Microsoft: Marketing | Microsoft: Other Search | Top News

Sponsored


About The Author: is a Contributing Editor at Search Engine Land. He writes a personal blog Screenwerk, about SoLoMo issues and connecting the dots between online and offline. He also posts at Internet2Go, which is focused on the mobile Internet. Follow him @gsterling.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://www.davidmihm.com David Mihm

    Greg, in all seriousness, I’d be interested to know what Bing returns for “Locksmith, NY” — are their “new” Local results less spammy than Google’s? That is certainly an area where they could IMMEDIATELY be 50% better…

  • http://tamale tamale

    Nice comparison, Greg. For future comparisons, please feel free to use the mashup I created..

    http://bingle.pwnij.com

    Cheers!

  • http://in-or-out.org pitzblog

    There is already a search engine comparison available:

    http://www.searchengine-compr.com

    Quite interesing to enter “bing” and to compare the results :-)

  • domagoj

    If you want to compare results side by side, horizontal or vertical, and auto scrolling both results at the same time, check this out:

    http://www.bing-vs-google.com/

  • dan

    Looked up the definition of “bing” :

    “bing” – noun, a heap or pile.

    “bing” – verb, obsolete.

    Either way things don’t look good.

  • http://blog.gadodia.net Vaibhav

    I use Bing daily since it launched. I have come to the conclusion that Google understands the context of your query better than Bing: http://blog.gadodia.net/bing-vs-google-no-fancy-analytics-pure-personal-experience/

  • sekarda

    check out
    http://www.stringy.com
    It searches Google and Bing at the same time.

  • http://www.frankelcoachinggroup.com crisfrankel

    One great thing about Bing is using it for shopping… Search the term wii in Bing. Notice at the top there will be a sponsored link for a percent off anything on eBay. Just follow the link.
    http://webhosting.reviewitonline.net

  • claydo

    The best site for comparing Google, Yahoo and Bing is http://www.search3.com/ It shows the results from all three search engines side-by-side. It’s amazing the differences. It also works for image searches.

    http://www.search3.com/

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/HZQ62SJJIJEHM2LD75HXFJJ4EU Uu

    =====  http://www.HYPERLINK “http://www.crazy-jerseys.com/”paybuybuyHYPERLINK
    “http://www.crazy-jerseys.com/”.com ====

    New online
    store for your business and shopping now      

    Air Jordan (1-24)
    shoes $33 

    UGG BOOT $100

    Nike shox Airmax Rift (R4, NZ, OZ, TL1, TL2, TL3) $33 

    Handbags ( Coach Lv fendi D&G) $36 

    T-shirts (polo, ed hardy, lacoste) $16 

    Jean (True Religion, ed hardy, coogi)$30 

    Sunglasses ( Oakey, coach, Gucci, Armaini)$16 

    New era cap $16 

    ATO shoes $42 

    Gucci shoes $42 ,prada shoes $40 

    NBA jerseys $33 ,NHL jerseys $29 

    YSL shoes $85 

    Bikini (Ed hardy, polo) $18 

    Accept Credit card,Westernunion,Bank transfer(bank wire)

    Very fast and safe

    =====  http://www.paybuybuy.com ====

     

    http://www.paybuybuy.com

     

    http://www.paybuybuy.com

     

    http://www.paybuybuy.com

     

    http://www.paybuybuy.com

     

    http://www.paybuybuy.com

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide