Is It Time To Send Google Maps Back To The Drawing Board?

Google Maps and its Local Business Center continue to be the ugly warts on Google’s otherwise smooth surface. But rather than the long-running problems with mapspam and hijacked listings, the latest sore spot appears to be an internal problem with Google’s apparently unsophisticated (or perhaps over-complicated?) database systems.

Mike Blumenthal points out today that Google is merging the listings of businesses who happen to have similar addresses or phone numbers. Here’s one example Mike shares:

maps merging

(Note that Yahoo has no trouble recognizing Duluth inns that have similar addresses.)

Mike explains Google’s situation like this:

“Despite having the Local business Center to provide authoritative information to a business listing, Google for a number of reasons and in a number of situations has always merged some business records inappropriately. The merged records will take on parts of one record and parts of the other in a somewhat willy nilly fashion, the url of one business and the telephone number of the other for example.”

On the Google Maps Help Forum, Google employee Joel says this in response to a business person’s request for help: (emphasis below is mine)

This is how our system works by design. Businesses that are the same address / location are merged. In general, it’s the right thing to do.”

It’s not the right thing to do. It’s dangerous and irresponsible to systematically merge business listings. There are thousands of businesses who share similar addresses inside a single office building. A single real estate office might have anywhere from 10 to 100 agents at the same address — each agent is a separate business owner, and each one deserves his/her own listing in Google Maps. A single medical building might have 5-10 different doctors, each one also deserving of a separate listing in Google Maps.

And in fact, as Mike points out in his post, Google’s merging of medical listings for two doctors almost cost a patient his life over the weekend. “Ellen,” who apparently works in one of the affected offices, explained the situation on the Maps Help Forum:

“Google merged the records for Dr John G Moe and Dr Kenneth Landis and this almost led to a tragic patient outcome this weekend. An emergency room doctor from Kansas tried to contact Dr. Moe to see if a certain drug could be given to our patient. Since the patient was unable to give the ER our phone number, the googled Dr John G Moe. Since Google linked our record, the saw the phone number for Dr Landis and left a message on his answering machine and since he wasn’t on call that weekend, we didn’t learn of the problem until much later.”

Whether it’s spam, hijacked listings, or in this case, problems with Google’s systems, mistakes with local business information on Google can sometimes be a matter of life and death. The irony, or the hypocrisy as I’ve written on my own blog, is that Google will cite the need for accurate medical information on the web when explaining why paid links are bad, yet it merges medical information in Google Maps when doctors share an office building, or leaves them open to community editing as part of Google’s “wiki nature” approach to local business listings.

Google Maps is one of the company’s fastest-rising properties, and in theory it offers a great way for local businesses to be found by searchers, even if the business doesn’t have a web site. But it has been beset by problems for years now, and remains vulnerable to abuse and internal problems (as described above).

At this point, it makes you wonder, is it time to send Google Maps and the Local Business Center back to the drawing board?

Related Topics: Channel: Local | Features: Analysis | Google: Maps & Local

Sponsored


About The Author: is Editor-In-Chief of Search Engine Land. His news career includes time spent in TV, radio, and print journalism. His web career continues to include a small number of SEO and social media consulting clients, as well as regular speaking engagements at marketing events around the U.S. He recently launched a site dedicated to Google Glass called Glass Almanac and also blogs at Small Business Search Marketing. Matt can be found on Twitter at @MattMcGee and/or on Google Plus. You can read Matt's disclosures on his personal blog.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • andyh

    Google Maps is a clusterf*@k

    Here are two more real-life examples of how it can screw with its hundreds of customer’s daily:

    1. When I was in college in DC, Google Maps once sent me into the middle of the bad DC ghetto to find a Home Depot that wasn’t there. I even called them and got a person, they had just placed it in a completely wrong part of town.

    2. Recently I called to make a hotel reservation in LA, I got the hotel phone # from Google Maps, it was a hotel employee’s personal phone number.

    These kinda things happen to thousands of people every day on Google Maps, especially now that they use it for popular apps on Blackberries and GPhones. Google has a responsibility to audit the quality of its algorithms and index for local.

  • http://fastcall411.com richrosen

    Matt – Nice article. I guess this data issue is a plug for Localeze and their Confidence Score.

    I posted a related article on issues with Google’s mobile results: Left in the Dark: Mobile Local Search from Google, Yahoo and MSN on the FastCall411 blog:

    http://blog.fastcall411.com/2008/08/left-in-dark-mobile-local-search-from.html

  • KeithGriffiths

    Great article; It must be said that if people use ‘Google’ to spam they have to be careful! The local listing provides a great way to Drive Traffic for specific business types.

    I believe that Google is in the process of testing the Google Local Listing at the moment and they are aware of current activities in relation to Local Listing spamming (loco spamming).

    Did anyone notice the singular term change in Google whereby if you search for Hotels, this activated the Google local listing section which is now based on IP Location; this is a Great move by Google! I believe this will reduce the amount of spamming in the Local listing section.

    In relation to this comment below;

    ….At this point, it makes you wonder, is it time to send Google Maps and the Local Business Center back to the drawing board?….

    With the technical abilities of the development team @ Google; there Business listing development system far precedes other Local business listings at driving traffic.

    By Keith Griffiths.

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide