Sign up for our daily recaps of the ever-changing search marketing landscape.
Dear Google: Crappy Results Like This Don’t Give The Impression You Care About Search
The debate about what should — and shouldn’t — show in a Google search result for “santorum” has been well-documented, at this point. But I’d like to use this now famous search to illustrate something else: how it appears Google is taking its eye off the ball of being a search engine.
Searching For Santorum: A New Surprise
I did a search for santorum a few minutes ago, and this is what I got:
See the YouTube link showing up there? It helps illustrate all that I think many people are feeling is wrong with Google right now. It’s a pretty bad result, and it’s also something getting there probably because Google’s not catching some potential old-school search engine spamming.
Universal Search Picked This?
The video result is showing up as part of Google Universal Search. That’s a system that blends content from Google’s various “vertical” or specialized search engines into its regular search results. It’s only supposed to inject this type of specialized content if it’s deemed especially relevant to the search topic.
Certainly, you can imagine that there’s video content relevant to a search on “santorum” from across the web. The Daily Show and The Colbert Report alone have over ten different Santorum comedy clips that might all be relevant.
Beyond comedy, there are news reports from across the entire web. The same search at Bing gives some examples of this, of how video content from Bing Video, as well as Fox News and CNN is inserted into its own search results for “santorum,” as you can see here:
Out of 20,000 potential matches on YouTube, out of 21 million potential video matches across the web, what does Google’s supposedly sophisticated Universal Search algorithm pick out to display as the top video content to be shown within the top search results?
A cartoon created by a company pitching its SEO software on YouTube as a way for Santorum to solve his Google problem. Wow.
You Couldn’t Have Picked….
That’s the most relevant thing that Google can show? I think most people would agree it’s not. I mean seriously, it’s better than these?
- Any of the Colbert Report or Daily Show clips
- Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum arguing with a student on gay marriage
- Dan Savage explaining how his campaign against Rick Santorum ultimately caused searches on Google and Bing to show a definition as “santorum” being related to anal sex
You Couldn’t Have Caught A 65% Like Ratio?
It’s embarrassing for Google to be doing this. And it’s worse when you look at the views the video has received: only about 2,000, at this point. That’s nothing compared to some of the other clips relevant to santorum, if you’re considering views to be one possible ranking factor. How does this video get such a boost?
Well, there’s another clue when you look at the number of likes the video has received: about 1,300, at this point. That means about 65% of people who viewed the video also liked it, a ratio that is hugely out of proportion to what you normally see.
For example, the classic Honey Badger video — which is hilarious — has a like ratio of 0.5%. How about the classic Double Rainbow video? Hey, 0.5% again. The Bedroom Intruder song? A tiny bit better, 0.6%.
Either this SEO tool video is something like 130x more likeable than any of these other videos or something abnormal is happening — something that you’d think Google’s spam detection systems would have flagged.
Can I Haz My Relevancy Back?
In this particular example, the poor relevancy isn’t caused by any of the ongoing Google+ification of Google. This result is what anyone would see, even if they are logged out of Google. It’s not caused by Search Plus Your World or anything like that.
But Google has spent so much time and energy shoving Google+ into seemingly every nook and cranny that it can find that this type of relevancy screw-up feels like another bit of evidence that Google’s original core mission, delivering awesome search results, is being forgotten.
Related Articles
- Google 2.0: Google Universal Search
- Google Universal Search Expands
- How The “Focus On First” Helps Hide Google’s Relevancy Problems
- Should Rick Santorum’s “Google Problem” Be Fixed?
- Google’s “Gold Standard” Search Results Take Big Hit In New York Times Story
- How Rick Santorum Is Making His “Google Problem” Worse
- After Santorum’s Win, The Daily Show & Colbert Report Laugh Again At His Google Problem
- An Interview With A Google Search Quality Rater
- Pages With Too Many Ads “Above The Fold” Now Penalized By Google’s “Page Layout” Algorithm
- Google Announces “Megasitelinks,” Image Search Improvements & Better Byline Dates
- FAQ: What’s The Debate About Google’s Search Plus Your World?
About The Author
We're listening.
Have something to say about this article? Share it with us on Facebook, Twitter or our LinkedIn Group.
