Is Google Authorship Affecting Rankings Today?

Many of us in SEO espouse the great benefits of Google Authorship and the potential of the rumored AuthorRank. Many in SEO would argue that AuthorRank has not yet been implemented as part of the Google algorithm. Or has it been added already?

The Scenario

A few weeks ago, one of my paid search clients contacted me with a problem. His normally very high ranking website had been dropping dramatically in traffic volumes from Google over the past 10-12 months. This particular client also is an association, a publisher of valuable information for the public.

Diagnosis: Panda

After taking a look through Google Webmaster Tools, Google Analytics and other tools to determine what might be happening, it became abundantly clear that there were certain pages of the site (very popular pages) that were the main culprit in the traffic drop in Google. While (not provided) might normally make it difficult to ascertain which specific keywords these pages potentially lost ranking on, the keywords on these pages are very specific because they are pages for very specific health subject matter.

Suspecting a Panda update (or series of updates) might have been the cause of the rankings losses for these popular keywords, I took the copy from a few of these pages on the client’s site and checked Google for duplicates. Interestingly, the client’s site appeared in many cases to have been completely removed from the index, but other websites (with the exact same content) appeared.

This is not the first association I’ve had come to us with this problem. Associations often publish informative content for their members or the public, and sometimes, unfortunately, their copyrighted content is copied verbatim and used on other websites.

Sometimes this occurs when association members (such as doctors who are members of a medical association) seek to share valuable information with their own clients (such as their patients) on their own websites. Often, I think this misdirection is innocent in nature, but it does mean that associations (and other content publishers) face a daunting task of protecting their content online, especially if one of these other sites outranks their own site because of Panda updates.

Further Diagnosis: Authorship

While the Panda updates clearly seemed to be at play here, I still found it difficult to believe that Google would not still rank the site highly based on its incredibly authoritative inbound links from sites including the CDC, NIH, CNN and many state departments of health. Clearly, this site is an authoritative site based on inbound links from other authoritative sites as well.

As I began to dig further and take a closer look at the other sites that had been plagiarizing the client’s site content, I found another website that was not only using the content but also had implemented authorship on these pages. In total, this website was plagiarizing upwards of 89 pages of content, and each page was marked as authored by them. Could this have been part of the problem?

A Few More Relevant Details

Some other things to note about this problem include that the offending website is a locally-based business in Texas. As a searcher based in Virginia, you wouldn’t normally expect to see this local business high in SERPs based on geographic settings.

However, this site ranked very highly for very popular keyword terms, ranking alongside highly authoritative sites on the given keywords and subjects. The site had few, if any, inbound links. After doing some research using the Wayback Machine, it was also clear that these pages were likely added in the May 2013 timeframe, so they were relatively new pages.

Dealing with the Problem

After the client notified the offending website, the owner of that site immediately took the content down. Within days, the organic traffic to the pages from Google (and the rankings) also began to increase.

After only one week, we found that of the 89 pages that had been copied and claimed via authorship by the offending site, 60 percent had begun to rebound substantially in organic traffic from Google, some with as much as a 125% increase in traffic from Google organic. Below is just a sampling of our initial findings.

Keyword ID Google Organic Traffic Improvement in One Week
1 23.7%
2 11.9%
3 26.2%
4 3.6%
5 8.6%
6 28.6%
7 12.5%
8 8.75%
9 14.5%
10 14.1%

You might theorize that this one offending site was the only example of duplicate content for these pages. However, in the case of page 1 from the table above, which has so far realized a nearly 24% improvement since the offending site was removed, there are still at least two other sites that also have the entire page duplicated.

In the case of other pages that saw increases, some had as many as 23 or more cases of duplicate pages and still saw significant increases (such as 15% or more).

Rankings Recoveries

As you would suspect, the traffic data indicated what we thought would happen… rankings began to recover after the offending site pages were removed. In the case of several keywords, we found that just removing the one offending site’s pages that were marked with authorship recovered rankings completely.

In one example that we benchmarked two weeks ago, the page for one keyword disappeared completely from Google’s index. Upon removing the offending site’s version with authorship, the page on the client’s site bounced back to a top 10 ranking in two weeks, even though there are still over 259 examples of exact duplicate content appearing within Google’s index from other sites.

My Theory

While it’s still early in the treatment of the Panda issue for this client, by just cleaning up one site — one with authorship associated with it — the pages that had been losing traffic have clearly been back on the rise. So what does all this mean?

My theory is that Google is using authorship, even now, as a signal of ownership and origin. In other words, if authorship is applied to a page, my theory is that Google is using this markup as an indicator of the true owner of the content.

That’s a bit disturbing to think about because it would mean that publishers could have their content essentially hijacked by spammers who choose to apply authorship. And in many cases, as many SEOs have attested, an individual author may not be appropriate for certain content (as I would attest in this case).

This leaves publishers that refuse to implement authorship vulnerable not only to the regular onslaught from Panda because of others re-using the content on their own sites but also to losing visibility in the search engine altogether due to invalid authorship being applied.

I personally hope that Google isn’t giving this level of value to authorship. Like many things in search, the days of authorship are still like the Wild West, and many kinks and problems are clearly being worked on by Google. But granting carte blanche to various individuals who claim to be original authors isn’t a good way to determine authority.

Google, for its part, needs to be aware of when an original piece of content was first visible on a website (when it was first indexed) and give that version leverage over someone just claiming to be the content’s author on another site, because this may be creating potential for essentially rankings theft.

Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.

Related Topics: All Things SEO Column | Channel: SEO | Google | Google: Authorship | Google: Panda Update


About The Author: is the President and CEO of Marketing Mojo. She regularly blogs on a variety of search engine marketing topics, often focusing on technical solutions. You can find her on Twitter @janetdmiller.

Connect with the author via: Email | Twitter | Google+ | LinkedIn


Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  


Other ways to share:

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • Nick Stamoulis

    “My theory is that Google is using authorship, even now, as a signal of ownership and origin.”

    I think that’s a very reasonable theory. The algorithm isn’t perfect, as much as Google tries to make it, and as you saw other sites that claimed your client’s content as their own were outranking your client. I don’t know how much of an impact authorship is having on the SERPs but I think it’s safe to say that there is some kind of correlation. Google would not let that data go to waste.

  • Giovanni Sacheli

    I made SEO for a close Dentist Friend by 2010, he wants to rank in first page for a very specific and competitive dentist keyword, so I worked very hard 3 years to move his new website from position 105 to position 11.
    Position 11 was the last stable position before implementing rel author for the Dentist Google + Profile. After rel author implementation his website jumped in 5 position and now it is a rock in first page, so what do I think? I think that Authorship is clearly a ranking factor that can be very strong in fine tuning SEO

  • Alex Miranda

    The Google Authorship which was supposed to Distinguish and validate your content in search results, has many issues. Google needs to figure out how to stop people from stealing other people content. I have had many of my blog post plagiarized and they then used their own Authorship markup. Instead of Google recognizing mine being there first, they added the plagiarized copy right above my post with their Authorship markup. How does Google not see this? Just as you stated, it affected my rankings. To this day the imposter still has it up.

  • A. Chris Turner

    This is a great post and makes me question, How does Google handle situations of an Authorship dispute?

  • GiGi Konwin

    So, does rel=publisher have no bearing on this at all? Doesn’t count for anything? I know the little picture won’t show up, but I would have thought it would help somewhat in the SERPs.

  • Jan Dunlop

    Good question as rel=author is not appropriate for many types of content.

  • Rob Robot

    Once the problem becomes more obvious, Google will check where content appeared first. It can’t be that hard to achieve, seeing as they already can find duplicate content.

    And of course claiming stolen content as your own is fraud. All Google (or content owners) need to do is sue a few spammers – that should stop them.

  • Jason

    Hi – I’m the CEO of a large online software Company and one of my team just forwarded this great article.

    With year on year revenue growth of 100%+, all growth was stopped on 24th May when we removed Authorship from our website. We’d rolled it out across our site only 3 weeks before, as a test to see if it would increase click-throughs. It didn’t – however up to that point, we ranked very highly for our target search terms.

    Within 8 hours of removing Authorship, we received a Google Webmasters message saying there was a major structural problem with our website and our traffic would immediately be reduced.

    Since then, our traffic from natural search has dropped by 50%+ and it’s killing our revenue. All our previously high performing keywords that were in position 1-3 in Google are now on 2nd or 3rd pages.

    I completely agree with the scenario that Janet has put forward, however there is more at work here. We don’t have a lot of duplicate content as we crack down on it regularly, so we don’t have other fraudsters have added authorship to our articles and claimed it. The 8 hour period of authorship removal to penalty is too much of a coincidence to ignore.

    Our SEO team believe that the removal of authorship has incurred an immediate penalty, just from the removal act itself. We’re gutted. Any thoughts?

  • Cloudy Paris

    Very interesting!!

    Jason, how do you establish authorship (that I think should be linked to a person) for a site that is a company, as yours??

  • John McDougall

    I agree with Nick. While its not clear exactly where this will head, building Authority overall is a powerful concept in search and social, not to mention in the world of persuasion. Google is clearly putting real efforts into this for a reason and it is well worth taking part in, even if limited in direct impact currently.

  • GiGi Konwin

    Yes, I’d be curious to hear that, too. I assume you have a personal account – or can you use authorship on a company Google + page?
    Really amazing story!

  • Maninder Singh Walia

    An eye opening report for me Janet

  • GiGi Konwin

    Thanks – that really cleared it up!

  • shurikenlord

    Nice report. I noticed I’ve been ranking higher than most of my competition when I employed Google Authorship without doing link building.

  • SuperTJ

    Wow, a new arriver to this great article. I also run a health related non-profit. I established authorship about 3-4 months ago in the blog portion of the site, obviously written by particular authors. We’ve had no traffic increases at all. “sites including the CDC, NIH, CNN and many state departments of health” — my God, really? That is AMAZING that authorship could be applied to those types of pages and that Google would give it prevalence over these clearly weighty websites. This really makes my head hurt!

  • Abhinav Narry

    It could be.. your experience makes some sense with the theory of Janet.


Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest


Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States


Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech

Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!



Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide