PageRank Sculpting Leaves NoFollowed Tags Behind

Six months ago, Google’s Matt Cutts confirmed that NoFollowed tags no longer work as a tool for sculpting PageRank and that he would not recommend PageRank sculpting in general. Despite the passage of time and much discussion in forums and on blogs, many website owners are still confused about the importance of optimizing how PageRank flows throughout their site.

My personal opinion, based on experience we’ve had working with client sites, is that it can still be important to optimize PageRank flow through a site. In this article, I’ll explain why, along with recommendations on how to do it. And this isn’t just about achieving higher rankings. I’ll also suggest ways to improve your site’s relevance to searchers once they arrive.

The rules have changed

In 2005, largely in response to the prevalence of blog comment spam, Google said that NoFollowed links “won’t get any credit when we rank websites in our search results.” That meant you could insert NoFollow tags as a way to shape how SEO credit flows through a site—a practice often referred to as “PageRank sculpting.” If you tagged links as NoFollowed, all the credit they would have otherwise received would be redistributed to other links, thereby giving those other links additional credit.

Then, at SMX Advanced 2009, the rules changed again. As explained in Matt Cutts’ post, Google would no longer allow credit to simply flow past NoFollowed links. Now that credit just evaporates. It no longer flows to pages that would have received it as extra credit under the 2005 rules. This means that website owners must now use other methods to affect credit flow—such as changing the site map.

Is PageRank sculpting now useless?

In my opinion, PageRank sculpting still has tremendous value. Yes, website owners must find a new way to sculpt PageRank—but with the opportunity to increase website usability and also achieve better SEO results at the same time.

That opportunity comes from exploiting the difference between PageRank sculpting using NoFollow tags and approaching PageRank sculpting as a general strategy.

PageRank sculpting as a strategy

PageRank sculpting in general has and will continue to be an important aspect of onsite search engine optimization despite Google’s change in its NoFollow policy. Consider the meaning of “PageRank sculpting.” Although I have not been able to find a universal definition, here is one I propose, based on the needs of website owners:

PageRank sculpting is the application of rules regarding the quantity, prioritization and relevance of links on pages throughout a site to efficiently distribute PageRank. For example, suppose a page on my site has 100 PageRank “points” to pass on to the pages that it links to. I will want to be strategic about how those points are distributed rather than squander them indiscriminately.

If the page links to too many pages or has less important links above more important links, or has links that are not relevant given the purpose of that page, I will want to make some major changes. My initial aim may be to “sculpt PageRank” in order to improve SEO rankings. However, in the process of organizing my links for better SEO results I should also be organizing my site to make it more useful and more intuitive for users. In fact, it’s almost impossible to do one without doing the other. That’s why PageRank sculpting should be tackled in tandem with the pursuit of good information architecture. Choices that serve the purposes of one serve the purposes of both.

What works for Google works for users

As search engines continue to evolve there will be increasing overlap between the things you do to improve Google rankings and the things you do to improve the experience of searchers who find your site in Google results. Here is a basic example of how PageRank sculpting and good information architecture can work together.

This is our made-up page called “Page 0.” As you can see, it links to 35 pages:

scotts1

Page 0 has 70 points of PageRank to share by virtue of the other webpages that link to it (not illustrated). Using the classic definition of PageRank that Matt Cutts uses in his blog post, each of the 35 pages it links to receives two points of PageRank.

scotts2

From an SEO perspective this works if pages 1-35 each have target keyword phrases of equal importance and value. From an information architecture (IA) perspective this works if pages 1-35 all have content highly relevant to the searchers who reach Page 0. But we’re not living in a dream world.

Regarding SEO: Pages 1-35 will be targeting a diversity of keywords. Those keywords will each have varying “potential” based on how popular they are, how competitive they are and how relevant they are to the products offered on the site. We want to sculpt PageRank so that more points go to pages that target high potential search phrases and away from pages that target low or lower potential search phrases. This requires reorganizing the sitemap such that links are selectively removed from Page 0.

Regarding information architecture: Pages 1-35 will have content suited to a wide variety of searchers, but it’s likely that only a small subset of those pages will be highly relevant and valuable to searchers who enter on Page 0. We want to architect Page 0 with the goal of prioritizing highly relevant links, and removing links that have low or lower relevance from the page.

PageRank sculpting (SEO) and information architecture goals must both be pursued simultaneously for optimal results. Why?

In my opinion, the more PageRank points that Page 0 passes to the remaining pages that it links to:

  • The more accessible those pages will be to search engine spiders
  • The higher the PageRank will be for those pages, thus contributing to increased rankings (all things equal)
  • The less PageRank points that will be “misspent” on low potential pages

The more useful Page 0 is to the subset of searchers who visit it:

  • The more likely it will be to accumulate links in the future and the more PageRank points it will have to disseminate to the pages it links to
  • It’s bounce rate will be reduced, thus improving the likelihood it will achieve or maintain higher rankings for the terms it targets
  • The page will feel “smaller” and more intuitive to searchers who find it, which in our experience leads to higher site-wide conversion rates assuming most other pages on the website follow this same philosophy

Also note the role of prominence—another example of how something that affects Google search results also affects searcher relevance. Just as searchers do, search engine spiders give more attention to pages closer to the top (those that are more prominent). That’s because spiders won’t follow every link from page to page every time they traverse a site. Pages higher in a site’s hierarchy receive more spider visits and so have a higher probability of being re-indexed—and therefore of receiving more inherent strength in search engines.

Link allocation criteria

Ideally we want only pages with both high SEO potential and high searcher relevance (i.e., the “sweet spot”) linked from pages like Page 0 that have lots of PageRank to share—as illustrated below:

scotts3

Even though they might not fall into the sweet spot, the most relevant links should usually be maintained even if they offer low SEO opportunity. In the past, low SEO opportunity links may have been NoFollowed as part of PageRank sculpting activities. Even though Google says there’s no benefit to NoFollowing these low opportunity links, if we believe their presence will improve the searcher’s experience, they could become a net SEO benefit. You do want to be stingy about linking to low opportunity pages, so consider using your analytics programs to weed out the truly relevant pages from the not-so-relevant pages and preserve your PageRank for high opportunity pages.

When we’re done prioritizing links that offer high SEO potential and high relevance to searchers, Page 0 might look like this:

scotts4

PageRank points would then be allocated this way:

scotts5

Now, high SEO potential pages have more than three times the PageRank points coming from Page 0 and there is less clutter for searchers to sort through once they reach the site. Techniques To Conserve PageRank Points

Here are some techniques to reduce the number of pages that a page links to—thereby saving PageRank points for key pages—techniques that also improve usability and conversion rates. These particular techniques resulted from conversion optimization testing we performed for particular clients, and may not work for you.

Reorganize the links that fall under a certain page on your site’s hierarchy. For example, you may find ten low SEO potential pages with very similar content. Rather than link to each one of these pages on Page 0, you may want to link to only one of them. Then link that page to the other nine.

Remove low SEO potential pages that offer little value to searchers you want coming to your site. You can then redirect them in an SEO-friendly way to more valuable pages. On category or product pages (or any page that appears deep in your site) remove the standard site-wide navigation. Replace it with several highly relevant links and content specific to that page. Provide a “continue shopping” or “continue browsing” button in the navigation for searchers who want to access other content on your site. Caveat: Test this tactic, as it might have an impact on usability; more on that below.

Perform usability testing and track conversion rates after you make your changes so that you know whether your changes actually have the effect you intended. Bear in mind that removing site-wide navigation from certain pages goes against standard usability practices. However, when done selectively, we have found it to be an effective practice when applied to some websites for improving both page rank and usability.

It’s also a good idea to perform usability testing and track conversion rates after you make your changes so that you know whether your changes actually have the effect you intended. Bear in mind also that removing site-wide navigation from certain pages goes against standard usability practices. However, when done selectively, we have found it to be an effective practice when applied to some websites for improving both page rank and usability.

A broader context

In my opinion, PageRank sculpting has a lot of value, especially when viewed in a broader context than just inserting NoFollowed tags. More than ever, your traffic volume depends on how well you prioritize high potential search phrases and pages. Both traffic volume and conversion rates depend on what searchers do once they actually reach a page. Do PageRank sculpting right and you’ll simultaneously achieve a stronger SEO result and convert more shoppers into customers.

Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.

Related Topics: Channel: SEO | Google: SEO | How To: Links | How To: SEO

Sponsored


About The Author: is President of Exclusive Concepts, Inc., a Yahoo! Small Business Partner that helps online retailers to increase revenue, get smarter and do more with less. Services include advanced search engine optimization services, conversion optimization and more.

Connect with the author via: Email



SearchCap:

Get all the top search stories emailed daily!  

Share

Other ways to share:
 

Read before commenting! We welcome constructive comments and allow any that meet our common sense criteria. This means being respectful and polite to others. It means providing helpful information that contributes to a story or discussion. It means leaving links only that substantially add further to a discussion. Comments using foul language, being disrespectful to others or otherwise violating what we believe are common sense standards of discussion will be deleted. Comments may also be removed if they are posted from anonymous accounts. You can read more about our comments policy here.
  • http://www.yfmmedia.com/ nkehrley

    If I’m understanding this correctly – google has taken the ‘use it or lose it’ approach to PageRank as it applies to the use of the ‘Nofollow’ tag thus affecting how someone could flow PageRank throughout their own web site.

    The use of the ‘Nofollow’ tag began as a way to identify untrusted content or bad internet neighbors and stop any PageRank from flowing to them.

    I have always wondered if a link associated with a ‘Nofollow’ tag got a negative PageRank point somehow. Is that possible?

  • http://www.periscopix.co.uk spoonman

    Scott, there appears to be an image or two missing towards the end.

    Great article though. Would it still make sense to nofollow things like shopping carts, checkout pages and login links?

    I like how this gets SEO and usability working hand in hand. As Google say, sites should be designed for users not search engines. If a technique does both, like this, then that’s a bonus!

  • http://www.spiderwritingseo.co.uk/ billmarshall

    Interesting article. However as with most such discussions there seems to be an implicit assumption that all links are the same value and I wonder if that is really the case.

    Do links in the body of the document count more than purely navigational links?

    Do links in footers and similar boilerplate areas get largely ignored/downgraded?

    And what about html sitemaps – if there’s a link from the home page to a sitemap doesn’t that greatly affect the PageRank flow? (unless of course it’s in a footer links that may get ignored!)

    This all quickly gets mindblowingly complex because we just don’t know the answers and testing the various components is fiendishly difficult. Maybe I’ll do a blog post of my own on this as it’s something I’ve been concerned about for a long time. Thanks for the inspiration!

  • http://www.visualscript.co.uk Badams

    I’m afraid I don’t necessarily agree with the validity of PageRank sculpting any more, Scott. You left out one important fact: Google had already changed its approach to nofollow & link juice, long before (nearly a year) Matt Cutts dropped that bombshell.

    And guess what? Nobody noticed.

    Only after Matt revealed what Google had been doing, did the whole PageRank sculpting fuss begin.

    I recommend my clients to only nofollow ads & user generated content. Everything else can be left alone. The key to proper flow of link juice is a good site structure. PageRank sculpting is not a substitute.

  • http://www.searchkingdom.co.uk RobAndrews

    Nice article Scott.

    I pretty much disagreed with the ‘nofollow’ rule change when it happened. My stance has softened slightly, but I still think Google could have applied penalties to those who were abusing the system. Maybe this was too much of an ask and it was easier to just wipe the PageRank from these links. If you have the ‘nofollow’ highlighter (it turns ‘nofollows’ pink) plugin on Firefox then you will they are still many sites out there that are way (way!!!) too pink. PageRank sculting is logical to me and I would have preferred Google to lower the trust rank of abusers (like they do for most other things of this type). You sense the ‘nofollowing’ was stopping some of Google’s indexing work and their ability to ‘index the web more than anyone else’ was being affected (which they couldn’t let happen I guess).

    Anyhow, PageRank is still the king of ranking in my opinion, it is just that PageRank (or the orginal concept of PageRank) has advanced so much over the years that still calling it ‘PageRank’ is almost like referring to a previous structure.

    I agree that PageRank sculpting is still an OK thing to do, but with different rules (and maybe it should have a different name – ‘link architecture’, anyone?). Google does not mind you looking at your site architecture and making logical decisions about weight and prominance for people and search engines. You just can’t do it with ‘nofollow’ anymore and get any benefit. You will just lose that links weight completely.

    I guess the one thing to remember is that all links are not made equal and they will not pass on an equal amount of weight. Think of any reason and it will play a part in this statement, the only problems is we have to test/guess the weight Google applies to each reason.

  • http://searchengineland.com Scott Smigler

    @nkehrley – Yes, Google has taken the “use it or lose it” approach as it applies to PageRank and the Nofollow tag. And yes, i’m sure it would be possible for Google to give negative points to nofollowed links, but I doubt they would as lots of abuse would ensue. Also, if a human does not trust a link, they shouldn’t link to it to begin with. Blog comments are an exception since humans don’t always evaluate all of those links, and that is why nofollow was created in the first place, as if to allow the human to tell Google, “I’m not vouching for this link.”

    @spoonman – Thanks for noting the missing image. I’m not sure why that happened but it has been fixed. As far as applying nofollowing for shopping carts, etc, the only real benefit I can think of to doing that would be to keep Google’s spider spidering the more important links on your site (hence a spiderability benefit rather than a PageRank credit benefit). I have not tested this specifically so i’m curious to hear other’s thoughts. That all said, i’d still prioritize many other SEO activities above this.

    @billmarshall – You raise a good point, although I did try to address it briefly in the article when I talked about “prominence.” I do think that could be a topic in its own right and I look forward to reading your post.

    @RobAndrews – Yes, I completely agree that the original concept of PageRank has evolved a LOT, though I think many of its original principles are still in play. My belief is that Google will put a lot more focus into behavioral aspects (bounce rates, search/click habits) though, and i’m not sure how that fits within the umbrella of “PageRank.”

  • http://www.mediawhizsearch.com Marjory

    This is a great article. I’ve never thought PR sculpting with nofollow tags was a good idea and I have to wonder if it every worked that well – why would Google give us that kind of power?

    I think it’s important to note that creating a good logical (simple) site structure that’s easy for a user is just a good idea anyway. I once saw a site with over 600 sitewide links in main navigation. That’s just not useful for anyone.

    I also like the idea of creating a simple top navigation to important pages only with sub-navigation within sections. For users though, drop-down menus are awfully popular. We’ve been sanctioning Javascript drop-down menus for years. Is this an instance where it can help? (I know that Google can read them more often now but it’s still possible to hide it in the .js file).

  • http://www.search-usability.com/ Shari Thurow

    Hi Everyone-

    Hot news flash: PageRank sculpting existed back in the mid- to late 90s. It wasn’t called PageRank sculpting then (because Google as we know it) did not yet exist. There were tactics that existed long before the NOFOLLOW attribute came into existence. So I find it interesting to hear this whole debate rage on for 14+ years.

    I know it sounds as if I’m beating the proverbial dead horse at times, but what I have to say bears repeating: you create site navigation schemes and other forms of relevant page interlinking, you don’t do it for search engines only. You do first, foremost, primarily, etc. etc. etc. for users. Accommodate search engines, of course, but users/searchers come first.

    Not search engines first, accommodate users. Users/searchers first, accommodate search engines.

    So, needless to say

  • http://www.search-usability.com/ Shari Thurow

    Whoops, didn’t finish my sentence. Sorry about that.

    Needless to say, users coming first might not seem as if it is a big deal. But it is. Too many companies waste time and money on sculpting. Great for the SEOs’ income but not good for users and website owners.

  • http://www.facebook.com/tpvcomercial.es Tpvcomercial-es Vicente Sánche

    lately heard that pagerank does not work for google web posicionmaineto is it true?
    I have a website dedicated to the sale of pos and would like to be well informed

Get Our News, Everywhere!

Daily Email:

Follow Search Engine Land on Twitter @sengineland Like Search Engine Land on Facebook Follow Search Engine Land on Google+ Get the Search Engine Land Feed Connect with Search Engine Land on LinkedIn Check out our Tumblr! See us on Pinterest

 
 

Click to watch SMX conference video

Join us at one of our SMX or MarTech events:

United States

Europe

Australia & China

Learn more about: SMX | MarTech


Free Daily Search News Recap!

SearchCap is a once-per-day newsletter update - sign up below and get the news delivered to you!

 


 

Search Engine Land Periodic Table of SEO Success Factors

Get Your Copy
Read The Full SEO Guide